width=100px; height=23px;

BACK

MILITARY
TRIBUTE

MESSAGE
BOARD

BOOKS

ARCHIVES

LINKS

CONTACT

SITE
MAP

Valid CSS!

What Defense Can a Liberal Offer?

Even though I have already posted a 3 part blog regarding the fallacy of "global warming" (now in Archives), and the perpetuation of the hoax, the blog of a friend, Jacob, followed by the blog of yet another friend, Nip, have inspired me to post another blog about the subject. Well, actually not about "global warming" per se, but about the constant bombardment of crises fostered by the liberal population, bureaucrats and politicians, most of which have no basis in reality or are twisted versions of the truth. And since I've already started with "global warming", I'll continue with that line of thinking first.

We just celebrated the 30th anniversary of Earth Day (22 April), which was founded by U.S. Senator Gaylord Nelson as an environmental "teach-in" (similar to the Viet Nam protests) in 1970 and is celebrated in many countries every year. This date is Spring in the Northern Hemisphere and Autumn in the Southern Hemisphere. The United Nations, however, celebrates an Earth Day each year on the March equinox, which is often March 20, a tradition which was founded by peace activist John McConnell in 1969. Senator Nelson (D-WI) wanted to start a grass roots movement over concerns about overpopulation and when there was a strong movement towards "Zero Population Growth." The story goes that Earth Day was conceived by Senator Nelson after a trip he took to Santa Barbara right after that horrific oil spill off our coast in 1969. He was so outraged by what he saw that he went back to Washington and passed a bill designating April 22 as a national day to celebrate the earth, however, the original concept of Earth Day was first proposed in a memo to JFK written by Fred Dutton.

The concerns voiced at that first Earth Day in 1970 were taken very serious by the liberals, and anyone who disagreed with them was considered ignorant or, worse, a conservative. So let's see what they were so concerned about back then. One of the organizers of the event said: "We're going to be focusing an enormous amount of public interest on a whole, wide range of environmental events, hopefully in such a manner that it's going to be drawing the interrelationships between them and, and getting people to look at the whole thing as one consistent kind of picture, a picture of a society that's rapidly going in the wrong direction that has to be stopped and turned around."

"It's going to be an enormous affair, I think. We have groups operating now in about 12,000 high schools, 2,000 colleges and universities and a couple of thousand other community groups. It's safe to say I think that the number of people who will be participating in one way or another is going to be ranging in the millions." (The final tally came to approximately 400,000 people.)

The nationwide event included opposition to the Vietnam War on the agenda, but this was thought to detract for the environmental message, and was limited in its involvement and focus. Denis Hayes, the chief organizer for the first Earth Day, wrote, "It is already too late to avoid mass starvation." Senator Nelson stated, "Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct." Peter Gunter, a professor at North Texas State University, stated, "... by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions.... By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine." Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb, predicted that between 1980 and 1989, 4 billion people, including 65 million Americans, would starve to death. Life Magazine wrote, "... by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half." Ecologist Kenneth Watt stated, "The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age." Watt also stated, "By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won't be any more crude oil."

The first Earth Day had participants and celebrants in two thousand colleges and universities, roughly ten thousand primary and secondary schools, and hundreds of communities across the United States. More importantly, it "brought 20 million Americans out into the spring sunshine for peaceful demonstrations in favor of environmental reform." (This estimate of attendees comes from Lewis, Jack [November 1985] in "The Birth of EPA", but cannot be substantiated by usual means.) "Senator Nelson stated when that Earth Day "worked" because of the spontaneous response at the grassroots level. Twenty-million demonstrators and thousands of schools and local communities participated. He directly credited the first Earth Day with persuading U.S. politicians that environmental legislation had a substantial, lasting constituency. Many important laws were passed by the Congress in the wake of the 1970 Earth Day, including the Clean Air Act, wild lands and the ocean, and the creation of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. It is now observed in 175 countries, and coordinated by the nonprofit Earth Day Network, according to whom Earth Day is now "the largest secular holiday in the world, celebrated by more than a half billion people every year."

Guess what? None of those predictions came to pass, so, when those catastrophes didn't occur, they simply changed direction. Of course, they take credit for "saving the world" by feeding the masses and forcing laws that kept us from all suffering frostbite. Now, it seems, billions are facing starvation again in "third world nations", and on our own Indian Reservations, while still others are facing an obesity problem in the "civilized nations" (mentioned in Jacob's blog), and we are all going to suffer heat stroke from "global warming". I have to ask, if we hadn't changed everything to keep from freezing, would we now be facing all this increase of heating? But, in reality, both theories were wrong, as history will show. You see, journalists have warned of climate change for 100 years, but can't decide whether we face an ice age or warming.

The previous "global cooling" crisis was raised by such an illustrious a person as Cesare Emiliani (8 December 1922 - 20 July 1995, an Italian-American scientist, considered one of the greatest geologists and micropaleontologists of the 20th century and the founder of paleoceanography.), while the current "global warming" term was the child of Wallace Smith Broecker (1975, "Climatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming?" Science 189: 460-64.) The latter was furthered by none other than a famed anthropologist, Margaret Meade, and was carried up by the British science community solely for the purpose of advancing nuclear power. It is also worthy to note that none of these people are climatologists or meteorologists, and that the terms "global warming" and "global cooling" have been in use since the 1870's.

So, to avoid the labeling the changing patterns that occur naturally on our planet as either cooling of warming, they have changed the terminology to "climate change", and are continuing to blame it on man, not on the real cause, nature. Yes, man has contributed to "climate change", and for some 10,000 years. But not significantly enough to warrant all the hoopla by the liberals and their harbingers of doom, the media.

In Jacob's blog, The Wrath of the Watermelons, he discusses some of the lunacy going on "down under" right now (No, we're not the only ones who have to deal with them). One such topic is one we have had to deal with here for some time now, "paper or plastic". It seems the liberals of South Australia have succeeded in getting a law passed stating that all plastic shopping bags are now banned, and you must either use paper (even though paper bags were banned there over 25 years ago) or purchase a "green" reusable bag. And since they have a law stating that all refuse must be bagged in plastic, their citizens must now purchase plastic bags to put their garbage in instead of using store shopping bags. (As if that will reduce the amount of plastic in their landfills somehow.)

When all this "stop using paper, switch to plastic" liberal panic movement started in this country back in the mid 70's, I could only laugh. I remember asking baggers to choose to "destroy the forests or pollute the earth by using oil byproducts". They usually just looked at me funny, but, if pressed, I always chose paper. Nowadays, most plastic bags are made of polyethylene, 80% of which is derived from natural gas, and only 5.2% of them are recycled, but try to find paper bags in any retail store today! Polyethylene, as a raw material, can be manipulated into any shape, size, form or color. It's watertight and can be made UV resistant. It can be printed on and reused many, many times. In many cases, it can be recycled but is not considered "cradle to cradle" meaning it cannot be recycled over and over or returned to an pure organic state, unlike paper. Oh, sure, it will eventually break down, but no one knows for sure how long it actually takes.

Now paper, to me the preferred choice, offers some very different aspects. Yes, it requires the cutting down and processing of a tree, or a lot of trees. But trees are a fully renewable source, and a huge industry. All across this nation are tree farms surrounding paper mills, along with many logging operations which reseed as a matter of both course and contract. Okay, yes, the equipment requires fossil fuels, but so do the processes required to make plastic, though not as much in plastic as in paper. And paper must dry, or be kiln dried, before it can be converted. But back to the bags, which can hold, if packed properly, 3.5 times the amount as plastic bags hold, so it requires fewer of them. And they return to an organic state much faster than plastic. Not to mention they make a great weed barrier when placed as soil cover, can be used as book covers, or trash can liners (just like the plastic ones), and make a great addition when creating compost. And 56% of paper products are recycled!

The cutting of trees has been used as a contributor to both the cooling and warming theories, and using paper is still considered taboo by the liberals who screamed for more plastic to be used, but now plastic is as well. We used plastic because we were not given much choice (Like I say, try to find a paper bag at WalMart these days, or anyplace else for that matter.), they forced it on us. Now it seems they are telling us they were wrong in applying plastic as the cure-all, and we need to use paper, even though they screamed that we were killing the earth by using paper in the first place. Bottom line, they simply overreact to every situation, force changes, then when those changes cause even more problems, they force us in another direction.

Just as Jimmy Carter has now come out saying that we must end our dependence on foreign oil, all while Pelosi and others block legislation to open offshore drilling as well as opening up the many oil fields we have on our own soil. It was the liberals among the Democrats who first blocked that drilling some 30 years ago, and forced us to utilize even more foreign oil to begin with. So which is it? Do we continue using foreign oil, or drill for and use our own? Even the liberals can't seem to make up their mind which way to go, but if we question it, we are labeled idiots and "right-wing zealots". Which leads me to Nip's blog, SHOCK: FRIGHTENING, OMINOUS CONFIRMATION-A MUST READ, and a recent article in, of all places, Pravda.

The title of the piece is, "American capitalism gone with a whimper", and is spot on. It opens with, "It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people. True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was. But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists." (I'd say that's a pretty fair assessment of what just happened with the bailout of Wall Street and the banks here, wouldn't you?)

"First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their 'right' to choke down a McDonalds burger or a Burger King burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our "democracy". Pride blind the foolish." (Sure sounds like what we see around us everyday, doesn't it?)

"Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different 'branches and denominations' were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the 'winning' side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the 'winning' side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power. Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America." (Sounds right on the button to me, how about you?)

"The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America's short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe."

"These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all. First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, loses and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more then ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them?"

"These men, of course, are not an elected panel but made up of appointees picked from the very financial oligarchs and their henchmen who are now gorging themselves on trillions of American dollars, in one bailout after another. They are also usurping the rights, duties and powers of the American congress (parliament). Again, congress has put up little more then a whimper to their masters."

"Then came Barack Obama's command that GM's (General Motor) president step down from leadership of his company. That is correct, dear reader, in the land of 'pure' free markets, the American president now has the power, the self given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will. Come hither, go dither, the centurion commands his minions."

"So it should be no surprise, that the American president has followed this up with a "bold" move of declaring that he and another group of unelected, chosen stooges will now redesign the entire automotive industry and will even be the guarantee of automobile policies. I am sure that if given the chance, they would happily try and redesign it for the whole of the world, too. Prime Minister Putin, less then two months ago, warned Obama and UK's Blair, not to follow the path to Marxism, it only leads to disaster. Apparently, even though we suffered 70 years of this Western sponsored horror show, we know nothing, as foolish, drunken Russians, so let our 'wise' Anglo-Saxon fools find out the folly of their own pride."

"Again, the American public has taken this with barely a whimper...but a 'freeman' whimper."

"So, should it be any surprise to discover that the Democratically controlled Congress of America is working on passing a new regulation that would give the American Treasury department the power to set 'fair' maximum salaries, evaluate performance and control how private companies give out pay raises and bonuses? Senator Barney Franks, a social pervert basking in his homosexuality (of course, amongst the modern, enlightened American societal norm, as well as that of the general West, homosexuality is not only not a looked down upon life choice, but is often praised as a virtue) and his Marxist enlightenment, has led this effort. He stresses that this only affects companies that receive government monies, but it is retroactive and taken to a logical extreme, this would include any company or industry that has ever received a tax break or incentive."

"The proud American will go down into his slavery with out a fight, beating his chest and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is. The world will only snicker."

Obama has sworn to "change how the world views the United States", and he is doing exactly that, and as that last line of the Pravda piece states, "The world will only snicker." Is it any wonder, when the liberals are the ones getting the press and MSM coverage? I have to snicker myself at the foolishness that continually comes out of their mouths, harping one crisis after another, with not a single one of them coming to fruition. And all while even more crises are being created by our own Congress and President. Sadly, these new crises are no laughing matter, they are destroying our nation one step at a time. From the nationalization of our automakers and banks, to the forcing of a national health care plan and its forced enrollment. From the raising of taxes on everything we buy and use to the outrageous spending on programs that are not worthy of consideration, we are following the path that the USSR and other communist countries took so long ago, and we dismantled just a few years ago. Even during the 60's and 70's, when liberals were marching for a change in our government, I saw them as promoting conflicting ideas. The path of Marxism, and the creation of a police state. Even though the Communist (Marxist) Republic of Cuba and the USSR were so obviously police states, they pushed the Marxist agenda, and claimed the Republicans were creating that police state. Their contradiction continues, and we are only beginning to suffer the effects that will come in the near future if this trend is allowed to continue.

The examples of the police state that is coming are already in front of us. First, the DHS report that drew so much fire, yet nothing was said about it by the administration just as though it didn't happen. And there was no outrage voiced by the MSM, but if it had happened during the terms of Bush II, there would be cries of outrage still coming from the left. But, instead, it was quickly replaced by the "Swine flu" crisis that has ended up not being a crisis, yet. Why do I say that? Because it was harped as being the worst flu pandemic to hit this planet ever, exceeding the "Spanish flu" outbreak of 1918, then slowly dismissed as an overreaction. But now people are forgetting about it, attending public events, traveling, sending their children to school as though it had never happened, but it is still out there, and is now growing and spreading even more than it was before. It will continue to spread, but it won't become the great disaster it was first said to be, though it will still be devastating.

Next, the arresting of a man who committed no crime, who only had a "Don't Tread on Me" bumper sticker. A violation of his First Amendment rights? Indeed. But swept under the rug without so much as a by your leave. Where is the outrage? And then the Air Force 2 flyover, bringing fear to the streets of NYC, and the absolute denial by the White House of any knowledge of the incident ever being planned. Anyone who has ever inquired about either of the two planes used as transportation by the President knows that they do not leave the ground without his knowledge, and he is always informed if they in advance are not going to be available, and, for security reasons, one does not fly unless both fly. Security procedures also must be checked to be certain that there will be no possible crisis that would force them to be needed. But with a simple apology and the crucifying of a subordinate as a sacrificial lamb, all is forgiven, and forgotten by the liberals and the MSM without a proper investigation.

These actions are only the beginning, there is so much more to come, much more danger for all Americans but especially conservatives who speak out. Yet speak out we must, or face the same fate of the Russian people of ninety years ago. And it won't matter one iota if you are white, black, red, yellow, brown or any combination of races or ethnic backgrounds. We must all stand together if we want our nation to survive!

WAKE UP, AMERICA!!

WE'RE BEING SOLD DOWN THE RIVER!!!

And I don't particular care to call my friends Komrade!

I end this piece with a request. Please post any and all examples of how liberals take first one side, then the other, of issues and crises, as I want to know what the rest of you see. Liberals who visit this page may make statements to defend themselves or the stances of their selected groups. I know there are so many more things I could have discussed, however I held off strictly so you could have the opportunity to discuss them among yourselves, and bring up some I might have missed anyway. Also feel free to pimp this out and send all who wish to read and comment. I will remain a bystander, offering only an occasional comment, and monitoring the rest. This blog is intended for American citizens ONLY, and all comments by Europeans or others will be deleted. Also, no profanity, other than the most modest, will be tolerated. Some of my readers are young people, others are quite religious, and I have no desire to subject them to any obscenities or profanities. Nor will I tolerate personal attacks. Other than that, have at it.


Get This - Survey Results - GlowDay.com

ALL PHOTOS, GRAPHICS, CLIPART AND LOGOS USED ON THIS SITE ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEIR SPECIFIC OWNERS AND ARE USED WITH FULL PERMISSION OF THOSE OWNERS. A NUMBER OF PHOTOS USED AS BACKGROUNDS AND CLIPART BELONG TO THE OWNER OF THE CHEROKEE PARKS SITE AND MAY NOT BE COPIED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION. PLEASE CLICK THE EMAIL BUTTON ON THE HOME PAGE TO REQUEST PERMISSION FOR USAGE OF PHOTOS, GRAPHICS AND CLIPART DISPLAYED ON THIS SITE, OR GO TO THE LINKS PAGE FOR USAGE REQUESTS REGARDING LOGOS, CLIPART, PHOTOS AND GRAPHICS FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS.

Copyright © 2009