Obama's Non-Existent Middle East Plan
A Middle East Peace Accord between
Israel and the Hamas leadership of Gaza seems highly unlikely, no
matter who gets involved. Our less than illustrious leader
appears to want peace in the area, or wants everyone to think he
does. But the realities are far different from the public
portrayal. Any thinking individual who wishes to broker a peace
agreement would want to read the precepts on which any two
disagreeing governments operate, find the things they agree on,
and the things they don't. Proper protocol in such a position
dictates that the "broker" use the agreeing sentiments to bring
them to the table, accentuate those similarities to find a common
ground on which to begin, then progress through the smaller
differences to find solutions before the major problems are dealt
with. The next step is to break down the major problems to their
root causes. Once the major problems are broken down, they become
easier to deal with, and thus resolution can be achieved. This is
common sense to any trained negotiator or mediator worth his/her
salt. No such thing is currently happening under this
administration, nor do I expect to see it anytime soon.
We have all heard that Obama was assembling his "team", his
cabinet, his minions, immediately after the election results were
posted in an effort to be "ready to hit the ground running". So
why isn't Hillary "running" to bring peace options to the table
between Hamas and Israel? Isn't that what the "one" wants? Is it
because they know it will never come to be? For all the flowery
and glorious talk of bringing a new perspective to the world, and
softening our worldwide image in the process, none of it is
actually going to accomplish a thing except to make us appear
more weak and susceptible to our enemies. Withdrawing our troops
prematurely from Iraq, then Afghanistan, will place Iraqi's in
danger of collapse of all they have gained to date, allow al
Qaeda and their cousins Taliban, Hamas, Hezbollah and all the
other Muslim militants, to gain strength, and leave Israel to
fend for themselves. Something they can do quite adequately, but
nonetheless in a less than envious position. So why is it I feel
this way?
Simple, back to the precepts under which any government operates,
its charter, Constitution, doctrine, whatever title or name it is
given. In this instance the Hamas Foundational Covenant under
which Hamas rules Gaza. I quote a portion of Article Seven of
that Covenant, "The Prophet, Allah's prayer and peace be upon
him, says: "The hour of judgment shall not come until the Muslims
fight the Jews and kill them, so that the Jews hide behind trees
and stones, and each tree and stone will say: 'Oh Muslim, oh
servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him,'
except for the Gharqad tree, for it is the tree of the Jews."
(Recorded in the Hadith collections of Bukhari and Muslim)." Does
it sound like they want peace with Israel here? Or how about
Article Thirteen, "From time to time there are calls to hold an
international conference in order to seek a solution for the
[Palestinian] problem. Some accept this [proposal] and some
reject it, for one reason or another, demanding the fulfillment
of some condition or conditions before they agree to hold the
conference and participate in it. However, the Islamic Resistance
Movement - since it is familiar with the parties participating in
the conference and with their past and current positions on the
issues of the Muslims - does not believe that these conferences
can meet the demands or restore the rights [of the Palestinians],
or bring equity to the oppressed. These conferences are nothing
but a way to give the infidels power of arbitration over Muslim
land, and when have the infidels ever been equitable towards the
believers?" See any desire for peace there?
Let's continue in Article Thirteen, "There is no solution to the
Palestinian problem except by jihad. Initiatives, proposals and
international conferences are a waste of time and a farce. The
Palestinian people is far too eminent to have its future, its
rights and its destiny toyed with. As stated in the Hadith: "The
people of Al-Sha'm are [Allah's] rod in His land. Through them,
He wreaks vengeance on whomever He wishes among His servants. The
hypocrites among them are not allowed to be superior to the
believers among them, and they shall die in grief and distress."
(Recorded by Al-Tabarani with a chain of transmitters to
Muhammad, and by Ahmad [Ibn Hanbal] with an incomplete chain of
transmitters to Muhammad which may be the accurate record, the
transmitters in both cases being trustworthy - Allah alone is
omniscient)."
Still not convinced that they don't want peace? Well, then,
Article Fourteen, "The problem of liberating Palestine involves
three circles: the Palestinian circle, the [pan-]Arab circle and
the Islamic circle. Each of these three circles has its role in
the struggle against Zionism and has its duties. It is a grave
error and shameful ignorance to neglect any of these circles, for
Palestine is an Islamic land. In it is the first of the two
qiblas [directions of prayer] and the third most holy mosque,
after the mosques of Mecca and Medina. It is the destination of
the Prophet's nocturnal journey."
"Praise be to Him who carried His servant by night from the most
sacred mosque to the farthest mosque whose surroundings We
blessed, so as to show him Our signs. He is the One who is
hearing and seeing." (Koran, 17:1)
"This being the case, the liberation [of Palestine] is a personal
duty of every Muslim, wherever he be. It is on this basis that
one should consider the problem, and every Muslim should
understand this. When the day comes and the problem is treated on
this basis, and all the capabilities of the three circles are
mobilized - the current circumstances will change and the day of
liberation will draw near." (Hmmm, "wherever he be"?)
"You strike more fear in the hearts of the Jews than does Allah,
because they are people who do not understand." (Koran,
59:13)
Here is another excerpt, from Article Fifteen, "The day the
enemies conquer some part of the Muslim land, jihad becomes a
personal duty of every Muslim. In the face of the Jewish
occupation of Palestine, it is necessary to raise the banner of
jihad. This requires the propagation of Islamic consciousness
among the masses, locally [in Palestine], in the Arab world and
in the Islamic world. It is necessary to instill the spirit of
jihad in the nation, engage the enemies and join the ranks of the
jihad fighters."
This last particular portion gives us the concept by which they
have revised world history, and claimed their place in it. One
merely look at any series of Mesopotamian maps to see that Israel
existed as a nation for well over 4,000 years in the Middle East,
and that they, and other nations, existed in a "region" commonly
known as "Palestine". Not a country, a region. Even after the
Ottoman Empire conquered and assumed control of the region, Jews
lived on in their homeland. Often persecuted and killed, they
never relinquished their place on the land. "Palestine" has never
been a nation, only a region in the past, and a mandate under the
British Mandate of Palestine of 1920, which was approved in 1922
by the League of Nations. Any common dictionary will define a
"Mandate" as, and I quote, "A commission from the League of
Nations authorizing a member nation to administer a territory."
"A region under such administration." "To assign (a colony or
territory) to a specified nation under a mandate." So "Palestine"
as a nation has never existed, yet Israel has, and in the area in
which they now exist.
I might also add that the "British Mandate of Palestine" was
dissolved by the successor of the League of Nations, the United
Nations, and the land awarded to Israel in 1948. As a "Mandate",
Palestine existed for a grand total of 28 years, while modern
Israel has existed as an independent and sovereign nation for 60
years, and as a nation in history for well over 4,000 years. Now,
you tell me which has the right to exist without further
question, and how anyone can hope to bring peace to the Middle
East as long as Islam is against it, and their leaders and
militants believe they can grow in strength and public opinion.
Especially if we are not among the nations of the world who will
lend aid and support to Israel, or any other democracy in the
area. Yet our fearful leader has decided to reduce our presence
there.
Allow me to interject one small side note here, having to do with
"wealth distribution". It isn't just a socialist concept, but one
rooted in Islam as well. From that same Hamas Covenant, Article
Twenty, "Muslim society is characterized by solidarity. The
Prophet, Allah's prayer and peace be upon him, says: "Blessed are
the Banu Al-Ash'ar tribe. When they are afflicted with drought -
whether in a town or on a journey - they would collect all that
they have and divide it among themselves in equal shares." This
is the Islamic spirit that should prevail in every Muslim
society."
And finally, to show how they chose to revise history to their
purpose, again from Article Twenty, "A society which is facing a
wicked enemy with Nazi behavior, that does not distinguish
between men and women, old and young, has an even greater need to
grace itself with this Islamic spirit [of solidarity]. Our enemy
employs the method of collective punishment, depriving people of
their homes and possessions. He pursued them [even] in their
places of exile, breaking bones, shooting women, children and
elderly people with or without reason. He established detention
camps to imprison thousands and thousands [of people] in inhuman
conditions, all this in addition to destroying houses, orphaning
children and unjustly convicting thousands of young people to
spend the best years of their youth in the darkness of prison.
The Nazism of the Jews targeted both women and children. The
terror they spread is directed at everyone. They fight people by
destroying their livelihood, stealing their money and trampling
their dignity. Their horrible treatment of people is like that of
the worst war criminals. Deportation from one's homeland is a
form of murder. In the face of such behavior, we must have social
solidarity among the people, and we must face the enemy as one
body, which, when one of its limbs is in pain, the rest of it
reacts with sleeplessness and fever."
I find it ironic, and sickening, that they would use "Nazi" as a
term to describe Jews, especially with our knowledge of WWII and
the Holocaust along with their own current actions and treatment
of others in war and captivity, in an effort to sway others to
their way of belief. But, apparently, from the demonstrations all
across the globe involving other than Muslims, it is working. And
Obama, for all his rhetoric, knows these things as well. So does
Hillary. Hence, all his talk of trying to bring peace to the
world by withdrawing our troops from the region of the Middle
East, and plans of sitting down with Islamic extremists like
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, are nothing more than smoke and mirrors for
the benefit of his followers, and an action that will cause us
great harm in the days to come. WAKE UP, AMERICA, we have been
sold a pig in a poke.
ALL PHOTOS, GRAPHICS, CLIPART AND LOGOS USED ON THIS SITE ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEIR SPECIFIC OWNERS AND ARE USED WITH FULL PERMISSION OF THOSE OWNERS. A NUMBER OF PHOTOS USED AS BACKGROUNDS AND CLIPART BELONG TO THE OWNER OF THE CHEROKEE PARKS SITE AND MAY NOT BE COPIED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION. PLEASE CLICK THE EMAIL BUTTON ON THE HOME PAGE TO REQUEST PERMISSION FOR USAGE OF PHOTOS, GRAPHICS AND CLIPART DISPLAYED ON THIS SITE, OR GO TO THE LINKS PAGE FOR USAGE REQUESTS REGARDING LOGOS, CLIPART, PHOTOS AND GRAPHICS FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS.
Copyright © 2009